AGCO-ALLIS 8765 or New Holland 6635 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for AGCO-ALLIS 8765 and New Holland 6635 (A), with the call on each
Question87656635 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?63.3 kW (84.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”62.6 kW (83.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8765 and the 6635 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8765 and the 6635 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?44.5 L/min (11.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 8765.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 6635 (A).
Which is heavier, for traction?3,908 kg (8,616 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”4,270 kg (9,414 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,800 kg (12,787 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8765.
Which has the wider choice of gears?12Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8765 and the 6635 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8765”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 6635”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–19991996–1998EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8765 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6635 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources