AGCO-ALLIS 8745 or Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 8745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrocompact 75 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (400 kg / 882 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 8745 | Agrocompact 75 V/F | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 51.5 kW (69.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrocompact 75 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 8745 and the Agrocompact 75 V/F. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 8745 and the Agrocompact 75 V/F. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 66.2 L/min (17.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Agrocompact 75 V/F. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,600 kg (5,732 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 15% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,615 kg (7,970 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The AGCO-ALLIS 8745 is 34% heavier (915 kg / 2,017 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 8745. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 8745 and the Agrocompact 75 V/F. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrocompact 75 V/F. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 8745” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 F” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1998–1999 | 2004–2006 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 15% more lift (400 kg / 882 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 8745 is 34% heavier (915 kg / 2,017 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 67% more forward gears (8 gears) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the AGCO-ALLIS 8745 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrocompact 75 V/F is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 8745 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrocompact 75 V/F has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources