AGCO-ALLIS 6680 or URSUS 5714?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 6680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | 6680 | 5714 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 58.8 kW (78.9 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 58.1 kW (77.9 hp)Wikipedia (pl): Ursus 5714 (open data) | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 6680 and the 5714. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 6680 and the 5714. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.5 L/min (10.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 58.0 L/min (15.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | AheadThe URSUS 5714 has 43% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 6680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 3,080 kg (6,790 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 2,315 kg (5,104 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | AheadThe AGCO-ALLIS 6680 has 33% more lift (765 kg / 1,687 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,050 kg (6,724 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 3,555 kg (7,837 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 5714 is 17% heavier (505 kg / 1,113 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 6680 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5714. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 12 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 8 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | Sources disagreeNo call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714. |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6680 and the 5714. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000/540E/1000E rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO-Allis 6680” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Ursus 5714”; OECD test report 1881, 2000; OECD test report 1882, 2000 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1991–1997 | 2002–2009 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The URSUS 5714 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The URSUS 5714 has 43% more hydraulic flow (17.5 L/min / 4.6 gpm) than the AGCO-ALLIS 6680 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The AGCO-ALLIS 6680 has 33% more lift (765 kg / 1,687 lb) than the URSUS 5714 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 5714 is 17% heavier (505 kg / 1,113 lb) than the AGCO-ALLIS 6680 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The URSUS 5714 is newer: production began 11 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 6680 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 5714 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No call on forward gears: sources disagree on the figure for the 5714.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources