UTB U-650/651 M or WHITE 2-62?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the U-650/651 M has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-62 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The WHITE 2-62 suits road haulage better on this data: 11% (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) more top speed.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | U-650/651 M | 2-62 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | 47.8 kW (64.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-650/651 M has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-62 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the U-650/651 M and the 2-62. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the U-650/651 M and the 2-62. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 40.0 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the 2-62. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | — | 1,692 kg (3,730 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the U-650/651 M. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,380 kg (7,452 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | 2,459 kg (5,421 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The UTB U-650/651 M is 37% heavier (921 kg / 2,030 lb) than the WHITE 2-62 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the U-650/651 M and the 2-62. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 10Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | 20Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | AheadThe WHITE 2-62 has 100% more forward gears (10 gears) than the UTB U-650/651 M (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | YesTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the U-650/651 M. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 27 km/h (16.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | AheadThe WHITE 2-62 has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the UTB U-650/651 M (both top speed forward, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the U-650/651 M. |
| Which drives on both axles? | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “UTB U 650/651 M” | Two-wheel or four-wheel driveTraktorenlexikon, “White 2-62” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1973–1990 | 1980–1981 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The WHITE 2-62 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The UTB U-650/651 M is 37% heavier (921 kg / 2,030 lb) than the WHITE 2-62 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-62 has 100% more forward gears (10 gears) than the UTB U-650/651 M (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-62 has 11% more top speed (3.0 km/h / 1.9 mph) than the UTB U-650/651 M (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
- The WHITE 2-62 is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the U-650/651 M has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 2-62 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources