New Holland TM165 or Steyr 9160 a?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the TM165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9160 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TM165 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 158% (4,730 kg / 10,428 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for New Holland TM165 and Steyr 9160 a, with the call on each
QuestionTM1659160 aCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”117.8 kW (158.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9160 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the TM165 and the 9160 a.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the TM165 and the 9160 a.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the TM165 and the 9160 a.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?7,730 kg (17,042 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”AheadThe New Holland TM165 has 158% more lift (4,730 kg / 10,428 lb) than the Steyr 9160 a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,333 kg (13,962 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”6,050 kg (13,338 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?10,500 kg (23,149 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”11,000 kg (24,251 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18 to 28Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”32Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TM165 and the 9160 a.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 9160 a.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM165”; OECD test report 1909, 20004WDTraktorenlexikon, “Steyr 9160”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20021995–1997EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TM165 has 158% more lift (4,730 kg / 10,428 lb) than the Steyr 9160 a (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the TM165 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 9160 a has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources