Massey Ferguson MF 4840 or Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 3000 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 4840 and Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL, with the call on each
QuestionMF 4840Profi Trac 3000 TVLCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?191.5 kW (256.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”208.6 kW (279.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 3000 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 3000 TVL.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 3000 TVL.
Which pumps more oil for implements?34.0 L/min (9.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4840.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,983 kg (10,986 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Profi Trac 3000 TVL.
Which is heavier, for traction?11,820 kg (26,059 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”11,500 kg (25,353 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 3000 TVL.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”18Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 3000 TVL.
Which is faster on the road?30.9 km/h (19.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”33.4 km/h (20.8 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4840.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 3000 TVL”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19861975–1988EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 3000 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources