Massey Ferguson MF 4840 or Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 2500 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL suits road haulage better on this data: 12% (3.6 km/h / 2.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Massey Ferguson MF 4840 and Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL, with the call on each
QuestionMF 4840Profi Trac 2500 TVLCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?191.5 kW (256.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”208.6 kW (279.7 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 2500 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 2500 TVL.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 2500 TVL.
Which pumps more oil for implements?40.1 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the MF 4840.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,983 kg (10,986 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”8,400 kg (18,519 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
Which is heavier, for traction?11,820 kg (26,059 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”11,175 kg (24,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 4840 and the Profi Trac 2500 TVL.
Which has the wider choice of gears?18Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”16Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the MF 4840.
Which is faster on the road?30.9 km/h (19.2 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”34.5 km/h (21.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”AheadThe Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL has 12% more top speed (3.6 km/h / 2.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4840 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 4840.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 4840”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1978–19861985–1989Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL has 12% more top speed (3.6 km/h / 2.2 mph) than the Massey Ferguson MF 4840 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Schlüter Profi Trac 2500 TVL is newer: production began 7 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the MF 4840 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Profi Trac 2500 TVL has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources