MAN 2L2 vs URSUS C-325

7 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

1958–1960

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

1959–1963

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the 2L2 and the C-325 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

7 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

MAN 2L2 and URSUS C-325, field by field
Field	2L2	C-325	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	24.5 hp	24.7 hp	—
Engine declared	MAN/Güldner D 9532 M 180	URSUS S-312	differs
Displacement declared	1.85 L	1.81 L	—
Maximum torque declared	69 lb·ft · 93 N·m	69 lb·ft · 93 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	11.4–12.4 mph · 18.4–20.0 km/h	12.4 mph · 20 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	Komet single-disc clutch	—	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Pump flow declared	—	4.8 gpm · 18.0 L/min	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	1,102 lb · 500 kg	1,543 lb · 700 kg	+40% C-325
Rear PTO speeds declared	540 rpm	540 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	2,866 lb · 1,300 kg	3,646 lb · 1,654 kg	+27% C-325
Wheelbase declared	80.2 in · 2,036 mm	72.4 in · 1,840 mm	+11% 2L2
Length declared	—	119.3 in · 3,030 mm	—
Width declared	56.9–59.9 in · 1,445–1,522 mm	49.2 in · 1,250 mm	differs
Height declared	61.4 in · 1,560 mm	59.1 in · 1,500 mm	—
Ground clearance declared	19.5 in · 495 mm	15.7 in · 400 mm	+24% 2L2
Turning radius, braked declared	8.5 ft · 2.60 m	8.8 ft · 2.69 m	—
Fuel tank declared	—	37.0 qt · 35.0 L	—

Source

Source