Lamborghini 115 DT Formula or New Holland 8260?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the 115 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland 8260 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 53% (32.4 L/min / 8.6 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 11% (550 kg / 1,213 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Lamborghini 115 DT Formula and New Holland 8260, with the call on each
Question115 DT Formula8260Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”84.6 kW (113.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 115 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the 115 DT Formula and the 8260.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the 115 DT Formula and the 8260.
Which pumps more oil for implements?60.9 L/min (16.1 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”93.3 L/min (24.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”AheadThe New Holland 8260 has 53% more hydraulic flow (32.4 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?5,190 kg (11,442 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”5,740 kg (12,655 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”AheadThe New Holland 8260 has 11% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,660 kg (10,274 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”5,290 kg (11,662 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 8260 is 14% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,500 kg (16,535 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24 to 36Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 115 DT Formula and the 8260.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the 115 DT Formula.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Lamborghini 115 DT A Formula”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland 8260”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1991–19961996–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland 8260 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland 8260 has 53% more hydraulic flow (32.4 L/min / 8.6 gpm) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 8260 has 11% more lift (550 kg / 1,213 lb) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 8260 is 14% heavier (630 kg / 1,389 lb) than the Lamborghini 115 DT Formula (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland 8260 is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the 115 DT Formula has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 8260 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources