International Harvester FU-265 D vs Warchalowski WT-38 B
12 material differences
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the FU-265 D and the WT-38 B → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
12 material differences · 1 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | FU-265 D | WT-38 B | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 34.5 hp | 34.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER FD-136 | WARCHALOWSKI D-32 S | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.23 L | 1.62 L | +38% FU-265 D |
| Maximum torque declared | 100 lb·ft · 135 N·m | — | — |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 13.0 mph · 21 km/h | 18.0 mph · 29 km/h | +38% WT-38 B |
| Clutch declared | — | pedal-operated two-stage dry Fichtel & Sachs double clutch | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.9 gpm · 18.6 L/min | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 549 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,012 lb · 1,820 kg | 3,197 lb · 1,450 kg | +26% FU-265 D |
| Wheelbase declared | 69.7 in · 1,770 mm | 78.7 in · 2,000 mm | +13% WT-38 B |
| Length declared | 116.1 in · 2,950 mm | 126.0 in · 3,200 mm | +8% WT-38 B |
| Width declared | 81.9 in · 2,080 mm | 64.0 in · 1,625 mm | +28% FU-265 D |
| Height declared | 66.9 in · 1,700 mm | 55.9 in · 1,420 mm | +20% FU-265 D |
| Ground clearance declared | 13.8 in · 350 mm | 16.3 in · 415 mm | +19% WT-38 B |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 8.6 ft · 2.62 m | 13.1 ft · 4.00 m | +53% WT-38 B |
| Fuel tank declared | 45.4 qt · 43.0 L | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | +23% FU-265 D |
International Harvester FU-265 D sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick FU-265 D”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-265 D”
Warchalowski WT-38 B sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Warchalowski WT 38B”