Hürlimann H-76 XA or ZETOR 6320/6340?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6320/6340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The ZETOR 6320/6340 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 26% (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 34% (1,028 kg / 2,266 lb) more three-point lift.
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA suits road haulage better on this data: 33% (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) more top speed.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-76 XA and ZETOR 6320/6340, with the call on each
QuestionH-76 XA6320/6340Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?54.4 kW (73.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”53.7 kW (72.0 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6320/6340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-76 XA and the 6320/6340.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-76 XA and the 6320/6340.
Which pumps more oil for implements?31.9 L/min (8.4 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”40.2 L/min (10.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”AheadThe ZETOR 6320/6340 has 26% more hydraulic flow (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”4,028 kg (8,880 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”AheadThe ZETOR 6320/6340 has 34% more lift (1,028 kg / 2,266 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?2,700 kg (5,952 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”3,025 kg (6,669 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The ZETOR 6320/6340 is 12% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?5,200 kg (11,464 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”5,600 kg (12,346 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?20 to 30Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”10 to 20Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the 6320/6340.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”25 km/h (15.5 mph) to 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”AheadThe Hürlimann H-76 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the ZETOR 6320/6340 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-76 XA and the 6320/6340.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann XA 76”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Zetor 6320/6340”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2005–20091993–2007Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The ZETOR 6320/6340 has 26% more hydraulic flow (8.3 L/min / 2.2 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 6320/6340 has 34% more lift (1,028 kg / 2,266 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The ZETOR 6320/6340 is 12% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Hürlimann H-76 XA (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA has 33% more top speed (10.0 km/h / 6.2 mph) than the ZETOR 6320/6340 (both top speed forward, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-76 XA is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the H-76 XA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 6320/6340 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources