Hürlimann H-468.4 A or Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A)?

Which should you choose?

On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A): hydraulic flow. On features, the Hürlimann H-468.4 A is ahead on forward gears.

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A) suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 78% (28.0 L/min / 7.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Hürlimann H-468.4 A and Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A), with the call on each
QuestionH-468.4 AMF 372 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?45.9 kW (61.6 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”45.7 kW (61.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the H-468.4 A and the MF 372 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the H-468.4 A and the MF 372 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?36.0 L/min (9.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”64.0 L/min (16.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A) has 78% more hydraulic flow (28.0 L/min / 7.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-468.4 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,899 kg (6,391 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”2,145 kg (4,729 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the H-468.4 A: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”); the MF 372 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?3,070 kg (6,768 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”2,800 kg (6,173 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the H-468.4 A and the MF 372 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”12Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”AheadThe Hürlimann H-468.4 A has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the H-468.4 A and the MF 372 (A).
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the H-468.4 A.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1998–20031992–1997Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Hürlimann H-468.4 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A) has 78% more hydraulic flow (28.0 L/min / 7.4 gpm) than the Hürlimann H-468.4 A (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-468.4 A has 100% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Massey Ferguson MF 372 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Hürlimann H-468.4 A is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the H-468.4 A: lift through the full range at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann H 468.4 Club”); the MF 372 (A): lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 372”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources