Hanomag R 35/45 vs International Harvester FU-265 D
10 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the R 35/45 and the FU-265 D → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
10 material differences · 5 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | R 35/45 | FU-265 D | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 34.3 hp | 34.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Hanomag D 28 LA | INTERNATIONAL HARVESTER FD-136 | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.80 L | 2.23 L | +26% R 35/45 |
| Maximum torque declared | 111 lb·ft · 151 N·m | 100 lb·ft · 135 N·m | +12% R 35/45 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 11.9 mph · 19.2 km/h | 13.0 mph · 21 km/h | +9% FU-265 D |
| Clutch declared | double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs | — | — |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | 4.9 gpm · 18.6 L/min | +16% FU-265 D |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 597 rpm | 549 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,453–4,678 lb · 2,020–2,122 kg | 4,012 lb · 1,820 kg | differs |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 5,732 lb · 2,600 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 72.8 in · 1,850 mm | 69.7 in · 1,770 mm | — |
| Length declared | 120.1 in · 3,050 mm | 116.1 in · 2,950 mm | — |
| Width declared | 62.2 in · 1,580 mm | 81.9 in · 2,080 mm | +32% FU-265 D |
| Height declared | 69.3 in · 1,760 mm | 66.9 in · 1,700 mm | — |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.7 in · 450 mm | 13.8 in · 350 mm | +29% R 35/45 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 10.7 ft · 3.25 m | 8.6 ft · 2.62 m | +24% R 35/45 |
| Fuel tank declared | 47.6 qt · 45 L | 45.4 qt · 43.0 L | — |
Hanomag R 35/45 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 35/45”
International Harvester FU-265 D sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick FU-265 D”
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “McCormick F-265 D”