Hanomag R 35/45 vs IMT 533
11 material differences · fewer than 12
Which should you choose?
Read our verdict on the R 35/45 and the 533 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.
Field by field
11 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material
| Field | R 35/45 | 533 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine | |||
| Engine power, claimed claimed | 34.3 hp | 34.5 hp | — |
| Engine declared | Hanomag D 28 LA | IM 33/T | differs |
| Displacement declared | 2.80 L | 2.37 L | +18% R 35/45 |
| Maximum torque declared | 111 lb·ft · 151 N·m | 96 lb·ft · 130 N·m | +16% R 35/45 |
| Transmission | |||
| Top speed declared | 11.9 mph · 19.2 km/h | 14.3–18.6 mph · 23–30 km/h | differs |
| Clutch declared | double clutch by Fichtel & Sachs | Pedal-operated dry IKARUS-ZEMUM single-plate clutch | differs |
| Hydraulics & hitch | |||
| Pump flow declared | 4.2 gpm · 16.0 L/min | — | — |
| Rear PTO speeds declared | 597 rpm | 540 rpm | differs |
| Weight & dimensions | |||
| Unladen weight declared | 4,453–4,678 lb · 2,020–2,122 kg | 3,175 lb · 1,440 kg | differs |
| Maximum permissible mass declared | 5,732 lb · 2,600 kg | — | — |
| Wheelbase declared | 72.8 in · 1,850 mm | 72.0 in · 1,830 mm | — |
| Length declared | 120.1 in · 3,050 mm | 117.0 in · 2,972 mm | — |
| Width declared | 62.2 in · 1,580 mm | 64.0 in · 1,625 mm | — |
| Height declared | 69.3 in · 1,760 mm | 54.0 in · 1,372 mm | +28% R 35/45 |
| Ground clearance declared | 17.7 in · 450 mm | 21.0 in · 533 mm | +18% 533 |
| Turning radius, braked declared | 10.7 ft · 3.25 m | 9.7 ft · 2.95 m | +10% R 35/45 |
| Fuel tank declared | 47.6 qt · 45 L | 37.0 qt · 35.0 L | +29% R 35/45 |
Hanomag R 35/45 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “Hanomag R 35/45”
IMT 533 sources
Source
- Source: Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 533”