Güldner AL or Güldner AW?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Güldner AL and Güldner AW, with the call on each
QuestionALAWCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?14.0 kW (19 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”14.0 kW (19 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the AL and the AW.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the AL and the AW.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the AL and the AW.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?850 kg (1,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”850 kg (1,874 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenNo call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,340 kg (2,954 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”1,340 kg (2,954 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”2,000 kg (4,409 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”8Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the AL and the AW.
Which is faster on the road?20.0 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”20 km/h (12.4 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”dependent (stops with the clutch)Traktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A L”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Güldner A W”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?19621962EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • No call on three-point lift: the sources do not state where the lift was measured, so the difference is not a reliable call.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on maximum permissible mass (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is dependent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources