Fendt Favorit 510 C or New Holland TM 115 (Traktorenlexikon)?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Favorit 510 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The New Holland TM 115 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 16% (16.3 L/min / 4.3 gpm) more hydraulic flow.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Favorit 510 C | TM 115 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 76.9 kW (103.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 77.2 kW (103.5 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 510 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Favorit 510 C and the TM 115. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Favorit 510 C and the TM 115. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 102.0 L/min (26.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 118.3 L/min (31.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | AheadThe New Holland TM 115 has 16% more hydraulic flow (16.3 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 510 C (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 5,508 kg (12,143 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 6,560 kg (14,462 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 510 C: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C”); the TM 115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition. |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 4,970 kg (10,957 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 5,334 kg (11,759 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 510 C. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 44Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 18 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | AheadThe Fendt Favorit 510 C has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the New Holland TM 115 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the TM 115. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Favorit 510 C. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”; OECD test report 1917, 2000 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1993–2000 | 1999–2002 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TM 115 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The New Holland TM 115 has 16% more hydraulic flow (16.3 L/min / 4.3 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 510 C (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Fendt Favorit 510 C has 83% more forward gears (20 gears) than the New Holland TM 115 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The New Holland TM 115 is newer: production began 6 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Favorit 510 C has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TM 115 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- Not comparable on three-point lift: the Favorit 510 C: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 510 C”); the TM 115: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TM115”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources