Doppstadt Trac 160 or Hürlimann SX 1600?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Trac 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “similar machines”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Doppstadt Trac 160 and Hürlimann SX 1600, with the call on each
QuestionTrac 160SX 1600Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?118 kW (158 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”117.7 kW (157.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Trac 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Trac 160 and the SX 1600.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Trac 160 and the SX 1600.
Which pumps more oil for implements?No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Trac 160 and the SX 1600.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?8,000 kg (17,637 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Trac 160: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”); the SX 1600: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?7,180 kg (15,829 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”6,800 kg (14,991 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Trac 160 and the SX 1600.
Which has the wider choice of gears?40Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”18 to 27Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”AheadThe Doppstadt Trac 160 has 48% more forward gears (13 gears) than the Hürlimann SX 1600 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Trac 160 and the SX 1600.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Trac 160.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1999–20012000–2004EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Doppstadt Trac 160 has 48% more forward gears (13 gears) than the Hürlimann SX 1600 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Trac 160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the SX 1600 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Trac 160: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Doppstadt Trac 160”); the SX 1600: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Hürlimann SX 1600”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources