Dexheimer Allrad 345 N or IMT 555?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 172% (25.9 L/min / 6.8 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Dexheimer Allrad 345 N and IMT 555, with the call on each
QuestionAllrad 345 N555Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?37 kW (50 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”36.8 kW (49.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 555.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 555.
Which pumps more oil for implements?41 L/min (10.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”15.1 L/min (4.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345 N has 172% more hydraulic flow (25.9 L/min / 6.8 gpm) than the IMT 555 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,200 kg (4,850 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”1,180 kg (2,601 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”Not comparableNot comparable on three-point lift: the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”); the 555: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,625 kg (3,583 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”1,870 kg (4,123 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The IMT 555 is 15% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345 N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Allrad 345 N and the 555.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”6Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345 N has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Allrad 345 N and the 555.
Which is faster on the road?25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Allrad 345 N.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Allrad 345 N and the 555.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”AheadThe Dexheimer Allrad 345 N is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 555 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
Which is newer, and what about parts?1976–19851964–1971Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N has 172% more hydraulic flow (25.9 L/min / 6.8 gpm) than the IMT 555 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The IMT 555 is 15% heavier (245 kg / 540 lb) than the Dexheimer Allrad 345 N (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N has 33% more forward gears (2 gears) than the IMT 555 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N is available with four-wheel drive; the IMT 555 is two-wheel drive (as stated by the sources).
  • The Dexheimer Allrad 345 N is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Allrad 345 N has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the 555 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • Not comparable on three-point lift: the Allrad 345 N: lift at an unstated point, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “Dexheimer ALLRAD 345 N”); the 555: lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source (Traktorenlexikon, “IMT 555”) — not the same quantity, basis and condition.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range, PTO speeds and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources