Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15 or New Holland TSA 110?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 6.15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The New Holland TSA 110 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 20% (16.7 L/min / 4.4 gpm) more hydraulic flow.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15 and New Holland TSA 110, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 6.15TSA 110Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?85.8 kW (115.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”85.3 kW (114.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.15 and the TSA 110.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.15 and the TSA 110.
Which pumps more oil for implements?82.3 L/min (21.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”99.0 L/min (26.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”AheadThe New Holland TSA 110 has 20% more hydraulic flow (16.7 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?2,876 kg (6,340 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.15.
Which is heavier, for traction?5,190 kg (11,442 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”5,480 kg (12,081 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,100 kg (17,857 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Agrotron 6.15.
Which has the wider choice of gears?15 to 18Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”12 to 24Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 6.15 and the TSA 110.
Which is faster on the road?30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”540/540E/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”independentTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “New Holland TSA110”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1995–19972003–2005Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The New Holland TSA 110 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The New Holland TSA 110 has 20% more hydraulic flow (16.7 L/min / 4.4 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 6.15 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The New Holland TSA 110 is newer: production began 8 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on weight (both unladen weight, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 6.15 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the TSA 110 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, three-point lift, maximum permissible mass and a creeper range.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources