Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 or Renault Ares 816 RZ?
Which should you choose?
On performance, every comparable figure that differs favours the Renault Ares 816 RZ: three-point lift and maximum permissible mass. It is also ahead on forward gears.
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 25% (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) more three-point lift.
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ suits road haulage better on this data: 24% (2,280 kg / 5,027 lb) more maximum permissible mass.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | Agrotron 150 MK3 | Ares 816 RZ | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 101.3 kW (135.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 100.8 kW (135.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 150 MK3 and the Ares 816 RZ. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 150 MK3 and the Ares 816 RZ. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 72.8 L/min (19.2 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | — | No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the Ares 816 RZ. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 11,560 kg (25,485 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 816 RZ has 25% more lift (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 5,390 kg (11,883 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 7,300 kg (16,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault Ares 816 RZ is 35% heavier (1,910 kg / 4,211 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 11,780 kg (25,970 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 816 RZ has 24% higher maximum permissible mass (2,280 kg / 5,027 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 32Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | AheadThe Renault Ares 816 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 150 MK3 and the Ares 816 RZ. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 540/1000 rpmOECD test report 2108, 2004 | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ” | EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault Ares 816 RZ”; OECD test report 2108, 2004 | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2000–2003 | 2001–2005 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ has 25% more lift (2,320 kg / 5,115 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ is 35% heavier (1,910 kg / 4,211 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ has 24% higher maximum permissible mass (2,280 kg / 5,027 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both maximum permissible mass, as stated by the source).
- The Renault Ares 816 RZ has 33% more forward gears (8 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 150 MK3 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow and a creeper range.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources