Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 or Fendt Favorit 612 LSA?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrotron 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 15% (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) more hydraulic flow and 25% (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 and Fendt Favorit 612 LSA, with the call on each
QuestionAgrotron 140Favorit 612 LSACall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?105.2 kW (141.1 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”106.1 kW (142.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrotron 140 and the Favorit 612 LSA.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrotron 140 and the Favorit 612 LSA.
Which pumps more oil for implements?83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”72.0 L/min (19.0 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 has 15% more hydraulic flow (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 612 LSA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”7,410 kg (16,336 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 has 25% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 LSA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?5,880 kg (12,963 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”7,025 kg (15,487 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Fendt Favorit 612 LSA is 19% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?9,500 kg (20,944 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the Favorit 612 LSA.
Which has the wider choice of gears?24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”20Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrotron 140.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”No figureNo call on PTO speeds: no standard PTO speed stated for the Favorit 612 LSA.
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140”4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Fendt Favorit 612 LSA”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2003–20041988–1993Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 has 15% more hydraulic flow (11.0 L/min / 2.9 gpm) than the Fendt Favorit 612 LSA (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 has 25% more lift (1,830 kg / 4,034 lb) than the Fendt Favorit 612 LSA (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Fendt Favorit 612 LSA is 19% heavier (1,145 kg / 2,524 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 140 is newer: production began 15 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrotron 140 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Favorit 612 LSA has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO speeds.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources