Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 or Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A)?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 38% (1,313 kg / 2,894 lb) more three-point lift.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 and Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A), with the call on each
QuestionAgrofarm 100MF 6140 (A)Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”66.2 kW (88.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the Agrofarm 100 and the MF 6140 (A).
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the Agrofarm 100 and the MF 6140 (A).
Which pumps more oil for implements?55.5 L/min (14.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”51.5 L/min (13.6 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,800 kg (10,582 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”3,487 kg (7,688 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 38% more lift (1,313 kg / 2,894 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?4,300 kg (9,480 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”3,660 kg (8,069 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is 17% heavier (640 kg / 1,411 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?7,200 kg (15,873 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the MF 6140 (A).
Which has the wider choice of gears?20Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”32Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”AheadThe Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the Agrofarm 100 and the MF 6140 (A).
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the MF 6140 (A).
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100”2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Massey Ferguson MF 6140(F)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2007–20081995–1999Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 has 38% more lift (1,313 kg / 2,894 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is 17% heavier (640 kg / 1,411 lb) than the Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Massey Ferguson MF 6140 (A) has 60% more forward gears (12 gears) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrofarm 100 is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the Agrofarm 100 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the MF 6140 (A) has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources