Deutz (KHD) D 3005 or Renault 351 M?

Which should you choose?

On performance, no comparable figure differs by more than its threshold: on this data the machines are level.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Deutz (KHD) D 3005 and Renault 351 M, with the call on each
QuestionD 3005351 MCall
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?18.8 kW (25.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”18.8 kW (25.2 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the D 3005 and the 351 M.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the D 3005 and the 351 M.
Which pumps more oil for implements?24.6 L/min (6.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”No figureNo call on hydraulic flow: no figure on record for the D 3005.
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?1,425 kg (3,142 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”No figureNo call on three-point lift: no figure on record for the 351 M.
Which is heavier, for traction?1,635 kg (3,605 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”1,960 kg (4,321 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 351 M is 20% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Deutz D 3005 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?3,000 kg (6,614 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 351 M.
Which has the wider choice of gears?8Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”10Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
Which offers a creeper range?YesTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”YesTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
Which is faster on the road?20.0 km/h (12.4 mph) to 25.9 km/h (16.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”25 km/h (15.5 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”independentTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
Which drives on both axles?2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz D 3005”2WDTraktorenlexikon, “Renault 351 M / R 7411”EvenEven on drive: all two-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?1965–19671977–1981Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Renault 351 M is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Renault 351 M is 20% heavier (325 kg / 717 lb) than the Deutz D 3005 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • The Renault 351 M is newer: production began 12 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
  • Even on forward gears (both forward gears, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 25% threshold, too small to call.
  • Even on a creeper range: every machine offers one.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540 rpm).
  • Even on PTO independence: every PTO is independent.
  • Even on drive: all two-wheel drive.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, hydraulic flow, three-point lift and maximum permissible mass.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources