Case-IH C 70 or John Deere 5410 (A)?
Which should you choose?
The figures split: the John Deere 5410 (A) is ahead on hydraulic flow; the Case-IH C 70 is ahead on three-point lift, forward gears and PTO speeds.
- The Case-IH C 70 suits PTO-driven implements (mowers, balers, pumps) better on this data: offers 1000 rpm.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | C 70 | 5410 (A) | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 48.7 kW (65.3 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 48.8 kW (65.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | EvenEven on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the C 70 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the C 70 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 43.5 L/min (11.5 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 61.7 L/min (16.3 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe John Deere 5410 (A) has 42% more hydraulic flow (18.2 L/min / 4.8 gpm) than the Case-IH C 70 (both pump flow, as stated by the source). |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 2,350 kg (5,181 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 1,640 kg (3,616 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Case-IH C 70 has 43% more lift (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 3,060 kg (6,746 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 2,721 kg (5,999 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Case-IH C 70 is 12% heavier (339 kg / 747 lb) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | 4,500 kg (9,921 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | — | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the 5410 (A). |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 16Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 9 to 12Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Case-IH C 70 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the C 70 and the 5410 (A). |
| Which is faster on the road? | 30 km/h (18.6 mph) to 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 30 km/h (18.6 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 540 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | AheadThe Case-IH C 70 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5410 (A) does not (as stated by the sources). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | — | independentTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the C 70. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Case-IH C70” | 2WD / 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “John Deere 5410 (USA)” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 1992–1997 | 1997–2000 | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The John Deere 5410 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The John Deere 5410 (A) has 42% more hydraulic flow (18.2 L/min / 4.8 gpm) than the Case-IH C 70 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH C 70 has 43% more lift (710 kg / 1,565 lb) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH C 70 is 12% heavier (339 kg / 747 lb) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH C 70 has 33% more forward gears (4 gears) than the John Deere 5410 (A) (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- The Case-IH C 70 offers 1000 rpm at the PTO, which the John Deere 5410 (A) does not (as stated by the sources).
- The John Deere 5410 (A) is newer: production began 5 years later. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Even on power at the PTO shaft (both power at the PTO, claimed): the difference is under the 10% threshold for claimed figures, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources