Agco RT-135 vs Massey Ferguson MF 7475

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2004–2005

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2004–2012

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-135 and the MF 7475 → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 6 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-135 and Massey Ferguson MF 7475, field by field
Field	RT-135	MF 7475	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	133.2 hp	133.3 hp	—
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 BTA 6.7	Perkins 1106 C-60 TA	differs
Displacement declared	6.83 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	530 lb·ft · 719 N·m	385 lb·ft · 522 N·m	+38% RT-135
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.6 gpm · 115.8 L/min	31.7 gpm · 119.9 L/min	—
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	2,176 psi · 150 bar	+53% RT-135
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	15,525 lb · 7,042 kg	13,779 lb · 6,250 kg	+13% RT-135
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	20,944 lb · 9,500 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	113.8 in · 2,891 mm	109.4 in · 2,780 mm	—
Length declared	198.0 in · 5,030 mm	187.0 in · 4,750 mm	+6% RT-135
Width declared	104.3 in · 2,650 mm	96.5 in · 2,450 mm	+8% RT-135
Height declared	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	114.0 in · 2,895 mm	+5% RT-135
Ground clearance declared	18.5 in · 470 mm	18.0 in · 457 mm	—
Fuel tank declared	399.4 qt · 378.0 L	285.3 qt · 270.0 L	+40% RT-135

Source

Source