Agco RT-135 vs Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A)

9 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

2004–2005

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

2007–2012

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

Read our verdict on the RT-135 and the MF 5475 (A) → It is generated from the rows below by a fixed, versioned rule set, and names the figure behind every call.

9 material differences · 4 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco RT-135 and Massey Ferguson MF 5475 (A), field by field
Field	RT-135	MF 5475 (A)	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	133.2 hp	133.3 hp	—
Engine declared	CUMMINS 6 BTA 6.7	Perkins 1106 D-E 60 TA	differs
Displacement declared	6.83 L	6.60 L	—
Maximum torque declared	530 lb·ft · 719 N·m	—	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Clutch declared	—	Driving clutch with 5 by 172.5 mm disc diameter	—
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	Closed centre	—	—
Hydraulic control declared	Load sensing	Load sensing	—
Pump flow declared	30.6 gpm · 115.8 L/min	29.0 gpm · 109.8 L/min	+5% RT-135
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	540/1000 rpm	540 rpm / 1000 rpm	differs
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	15,525 lb · 7,042 kg	9,910 lb · 4,495 kg	+57% RT-135
Maximum permissible mass declared	—	18,519 lb · 8,400 kg	—
Wheelbase declared	113.8 in · 2,891 mm	109.4 in · 2,780 mm	—
Length declared	198.0 in · 5,030 mm	122.9 in · 3,122 mm	+61% RT-135
Width declared	104.3 in · 2,650 mm	78.4 in · 1,991 mm	+33% RT-135
Height declared	120.1 in · 3,050 mm	111.0 in · 2,820 mm	+8% RT-135
Ground clearance declared	18.5 in · 470 mm	15.4 in · 390 mm	+21% RT-135
Fuel tank declared	399.4 qt · 378.0 L	—	—

Source

Source