Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6?

Which should you choose?

The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130.6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.

Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.

What decides it, question by question?

Buyer questions for Agco RT-120 (Traktorenlexikon) and Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6, with the call on each
QuestionRT-120Agrotron 130.6Call
Which puts more power through the PTO shaft?88.3 kW (118.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”89.8 kW (120.4 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130.6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft?No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the Agrotron 130.6.
Which pulls harder at the drawbar?No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the RT-120 and the Agrotron 130.6.
Which pumps more oil for implements?127.4 L/min (33.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”83.0 L/min (21.9 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”AheadThe Agco RT-120 has 53% more hydraulic flow (44.4 L/min / 11.7 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
Which lifts more on the three-point hitch?4,951 kg (10,915 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”6,220 kg (13,713 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 has 26% more lift (1,269 kg / 2,798 lb) than the Agco RT-120 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
Which is heavier, for traction?6,905 kg (15,223 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”5,460 kg (12,037 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco RT-120 is 26% heavier (1,445 kg / 3,186 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
Which may carry more ballast and load?8,500 kg (18,739 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the RT-120.
Which has the wider choice of gears?Stepless (CVT)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”24 forwardTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”DifferTransmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 is stepless (CVT) and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 has 24 forward gears — not called.
Which offers a creeper range?No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the RT-120 and the Agrotron 130.6.
Which is faster on the road?40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
Which offers more PTO speeds?540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive?independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 130.6.
Which drives on both axles?4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO RT 120”; OECD test report 2235, 20054WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130 (NEW)”EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
Which is newer, and what about parts?2004–20052005–2008EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.

What does this mean in plain words?

  • The Agco RT-120 has 53% more hydraulic flow (44.4 L/min / 11.7 gpm) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 (both pump flow, as stated by the source).
  • The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 has 26% more lift (1,269 kg / 2,798 lb) than the Agco RT-120 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
  • The Agco RT-120 is 26% heavier (1,445 kg / 3,186 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
  • Transmissions differ in kind: the Agco RT-120 is stepless (CVT) and the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 130.6 has 24 forward gears — not called.
  • Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
  • Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
  • Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
  • Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
  • Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the RT-120 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 130.6 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
  • No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.

← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources