Agco DT-250 B vs John Deere 8295 RT

5 material differences · fewer than 12

Tractor one

Agco DT-250 B

2009–2010

No measured PTO figure

Tractor two

John Deere 8295 RT

from 2009

No measured PTO figure

Which should you choose?

We will not advise between these two machines, because their unladen weight differs by more than 25% (33%); the drive differs (4WD; Tracks); the 8295 RT is on tracks, not an alternative to an ordinary tractor. The figures below are side by side so you can judge them yourself; each says whether it was measured, claimed or declared by its source.

Field by field

5 material differences · 2 fields identical or within 5%, which is not counted as material

Agco DT-250 B and John Deere 8295 RT, field by field
Field	DT-250 B	8295 RT	Gap
Engine
Engine power, claimed claimed	286.0 hp	291 hp	—
Engine declared	SISU-DIESEL 84 CTA-4V	—	—
Displacement declared	8.42 L	—	—
Maximum torque declared	—	966 lb·ft · 1,310 N·m	—
Transmission
Top speed declared	24.9–31.1 mph · 40–50 km/h	24.9 mph · 40 km/h	differs
Hydraulics & hitch
Hydraulic centre declared	—	Closed centre	—
Pump flow declared	27.9 gpm · 105.5 L/min	—	—
Pressure declared	3,336 psi · 230 bar	—	—
Three-point lift at ends declared	24,595 lb · 11,156 kg	—	—
Rear PTO speeds declared	1000 rpm	1000 rpm	—
Weight & dimensions
Unladen weight declared	25,838 lb · 11,720 kg	34,392 lb · 15,600 kg	+33% 8295 RT
Wheelbase declared	122.2 in · 3,105 mm	—	—
Length declared	215.7 in · 5,479 mm	231.9 in · 5,890 mm	+8% 8295 RT
Width declared	79.3 in · 2,014 mm	115.0 in · 2,920 mm	+45% 8295 RT
Height declared	141.0 in · 3,581 mm	130.7 in · 3,320 mm	+8% DT-250 B
Ground clearance declared	18.5 in · 470 mm	—	—
Turning radius, braked declared	24.3 ft · 7.40 m	—	—
Fuel tank declared	623.4 qt · 590.0 L	—	—

Agco DT-250 B sources

Source

Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 250 B”
Source: Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 205 B”

John Deere 8295 RT sources

Source

Source: Traktorenlexikon, “John Deere 8295 RT”
Source: OECD test report 2589, 2011