Agco DT-160 or Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7?
Which should you choose?
The data can’t decide this. Power at the PTO shaft cannot be compared: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 165.7 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 suits loader and hydraulic implement work better on this data: 27% (1,940 kg / 4,277 lb) more three-point lift.
Generated by rule set compare@4 from the figures on the side-by-side table, allowed by route “the same stated configuration”. Measured figures are compared only with measured, claimed only with claimed, at the same test condition; differences within each figure’s tolerance are not called.
What decides it, question by question?
| Question | DT-160 | Agrotron 165.7 | Call |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which puts more power through the PTO shaft? | 119.2 kW (159.8 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 120 kW (161 hp)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | Not comparableNot comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 165.7 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft. |
| Which turns a litre of fuel into more work at the shaft? | — | — | No figureNo call on fuel efficiency at the shaft: no figure on record for the DT-160 and the Agrotron 165.7. |
| Which pulls harder at the drawbar? | — | — | No figureNo call on drawbar power: no figure on record for the DT-160 and the Agrotron 165.7. |
| Which pumps more oil for implements? | 116.6 L/min (30.8 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 120 L/min (31.7 gpm)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | EvenEven on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call. |
| Which lifts more on the three-point hitch? | 7,300 kg (16,094 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 9,240 kg (20,371 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 has 27% more lift (1,940 kg / 4,277 lb) than the Agco DT-160 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source). |
| Which is heavier, for traction? | 8,623 kg (19,010 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 5,970 kg (13,162 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | Ahead (a fact, not an advantage)The Agco DT-160 is 44% heavier (2,653 kg / 5,849 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source). |
| Which may carry more ballast and load? | — | 10,000 kg (22,046 lb)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | No figureNo call on maximum permissible mass: no figure on record for the DT-160. |
| Which has the wider choice of gears? | 18Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 24Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | AheadThe Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Agco DT-160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source). |
| Which offers a creeper range? | — | — | No figureNo call on a creeper range: not stated for the DT-160 and the Agrotron 165.7. |
| Which is faster on the road? | 40 km/h (24.9 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 40 km/h (24.9 mph) to 50 km/h (31.1 mph)Traktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | EvenEven on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap. |
| Which offers more PTO speeds? | 540/1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 540 rpm / 1000 rpmTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | EvenEven on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm). |
| Which PTO runs independently of the ground drive? | independentTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | — | No figureNo call on PTO independence: not stated for the Agrotron 165.7. |
| Which drives on both axles? | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “AGCO DT 160” | 4WDTraktorenlexikon, “Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7” | EvenEven on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive. |
| Which is newer, and what about parts? | 2002–2004 | 2005–2007 | EvenSame era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts. |
What does this mean in plain words?
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 has 27% more lift (1,940 kg / 4,277 lb) than the Agco DT-160 (both lift at the hitch ends, as stated by the source).
- The Agco DT-160 is 44% heavier (2,653 kg / 5,849 lb) than the Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 (both unladen weight, as stated by the source).
- The Deutz-Fahr Agrotron 165.7 has 33% more forward gears (6 gears) than the Agco DT-160 (both forward gears, as stated by the source).
- Even on hydraulic flow (both pump flow, as stated by the source): the difference is under the 10% threshold, too small to call.
- Even on top speed (both top speed forward, as stated by the source): the figures vary by configuration and the ranges overlap.
- Even on PTO speeds: the same speeds (540, 1000 rpm).
- Even on drive: every machine is available with four-wheel drive.
- Same era: production began within 5 years of each other. We hold no parts-availability data, so there is no call on parts.
- Not comparable on power at the PTO shaft: the DT-160 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft; the Agrotron 165.7 has only engine power (gross or net not stated), claimed — a different quantity from power at the shaft.
- No figure on record for every machine, so no call on: fuel efficiency at the shaft, drawbar power, maximum permissible mass, a creeper range and PTO independence.
← Every figure for both machines, side by side, with sources